University of Helsinki 22nd in global sustainability ranking

Like last year, the University of Helsinki ranked best in societal impact of the health research conducted at universities and the health and wellbeing of university communities.

Overall, the University of Helsinki placed 22nd in the QS World University Rankings: Sustainability 2026 ranking, which measures institutions’ ability to tackle environmental, social and governance (ESG) challenges. In other words, the focus is on the universities’ environmental and social impact as well as their administrative practices.   

Similarly to last year, the University of Helsinki was ranked first in the world for the health and wellbeing indicator, which assesses the output and social impact of institutions’ health-related research as well as the academic community’s access to healthcare and wellbeing services.  The University also placed among the top universities in the categories for good governance (3rd) and research aligned with the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (4th).

The ranking included 2002 universities worldwide. Last year they numbered 1,751, of which the University of Helsinki placed 18th.

In Finland the University of Helsinki ranks first and in Europe 11th. The ranking included 12 Finnish and 618 European universities.

The ranking is based on nine indicators, eight of which place the University of Helsinki among the top 100. 

 

 

What does the QS World University Rankings: Sustainability ranking measure?

The QS World University Rankings: Sustainability evaluates the environmental and social impact as well as the governance of universities.  The 2026 ranking is the fourth of its kind.

The ranking examines and scores university operations using nine indicators. For eight of these indicators, the University of Helsinki ranks among the top 100, while three of them place the University among the top 10. 

The ranking considers, besides data provided by the universities (25% of the overall score), data on, for example, reputation and alumni, as well as national statistics (75% of the overall score). 

In terms of the overall ranking, environmental and social impact are weighted equally at 45%, with the remaining 10% accounted for by governance. 

.