A team of over 70 scientists used open-top chambers (OTCs) to experimentally simulate the effects of warming on 28 tundra sites around the world. OTCs basically serve as mini-greenhouses, blocking wind and trapping heat to create local warming.
The warming experiments led to a 1.4°C increase in air temperature and a 0.4°C increase in soil temperature, along with a 1.6% drop in soil moisture. These changes boosted ecosystem respiration by 30% during the growing season, causing more carbon to be released because of increased metabolic activity in soil and plants. The changes persisted for at least 25 years after the start of the experimental warming – which earlier studies hadn’t revealed.
‘We knew from earlier studies that we were likely to find an increase in respiration with warming, but we found a remarkable increase – nearly four times greater than previously estimated, though it varied with time and location,’ says Sybryn Maes of Umeå University, the study’s lead author.
The increase in ecosystem respiration also varied with local soil conditions, such as nitrogen and pH levels. This means that differences in soil conditions and other factors lead to geographic differences in the response – some regions will see more carbon release than others. Understanding the links between soil conditions and respiration in response to warming is important for creating better climate models.
‘Our work represents the first assessment of ecosystem respiration response to experimental warming across such a broad environmental gradient in the tundra, incorporating a comprehensive set of environmental drivers,’ says Professor Ellen Dorrepaal of Umeå University.
’By compiling data from multiple similar warming experiments, it was possible to analyze spatial variability in warming responses across tundra’, tells Doctoral Researcher Eero Myrsky from University of Helsinki. Myrsky measured carbon fluxes in Abisko, Sweden, as part of his PhD project.
The study also offers a broader perspective on Arctic and alpine regions by predicting increases in respiration across the whole tundra area together with more detailed information about variation in the sensitivity of the response.
‘We see that some areas, particularly parts of Siberia and Canada, exhibit greater sensitivity to warming,’ says Professor Matti Kummu of Aalto University. ‘We anticipate an increase in respiration across the whole Arctic and alpine tundra, but more in situ data, particularly on the local soil conditions, is key to addressing the outstanding uncertainties and refining our predictions.’
’Ecosystem respiration increased more on nutrient-poor than nutrient-rich sites, while increased plant biomass had no direct link to the strength of respiration response’ explains Academy Research Fellow Elina Kaarlejärvi from University of Helsinki, who surveyed plant communities in Swedish and Norwegian sites.
‘The study is an example of the power of long-term international research collaboration, and how it can provide on large-scale knowledge ecosystem changes’, says professor Anne Tolvanen from the Natural Resources Institute Finland. ‘Our site in subarctic Kilpisjärvi, established in 1994, represents Finland. It is globally one among the longest-term field sites in this research team.
Understanding how ecosystems shift in response to climate change and how these changes feed back into the climate is vital to get an accurate picture of how our world will change. These findings serve as an important baseline for improved climate models, but the researchers plan to refine them further by analyzing how the experimental sites change over time and expand the experiment’s scope to include new sites.