In 1969, the novella A Week Like Any Other by Natalya Baranskaya was published in Novyi mir, the most famous Soviet literary journal. The story follows a research institute employee and mother of two through seven exhausting days of juggling work deadlines, household chores, and childcare. The protagonist rushes constantly, sleeps too little, and despite her best efforts, feels she's failing at everything. Nevertheless, when her husband suggests she quit her job, she replies that doing so would mean her extinction.
The editorial board showed considerable courage in publishing this work, as it exposed the persistence of patriarchy in a society that claimed to have achieved women's equality through socialist policies.
The novella sparked widespread discussion. Readers actively submitted their reviews to the Novyi mir editorial board. These remarkable letters offer a rare window into the inner lives of Soviet women navigating the challenges of combining careers with motherhood. These were not typical book reviews—they were confessional narratives where readers shared intimate details of their own lives.
The women who wrote were primarily educated, urban, working mothers. Their letters painted an even grimmer picture than Baranskaya's already stark novella. They described chronic exhaustion, constant guilt, and the impossible task of excelling simultaneously as workers, mothers, and housewives. Some worked for years without a single day off. One university instructor admitted to regularly leaving her sick four-year-old alone rather than missing work and damaging her professional reputation.
Perhaps the most striking passage came from a Moscow area reader:
“All of us women are victims of a state machine at full throttle and speeding up, and in its noise, you can hear the crunch of our bones.”
Despite their evident suffering, none of these women considered quitting work. This presents a fascinating puzzle that challenges common assumptions about Soviet society. Contrary to popular belief, by the 1960s, Soviet women were not forced to work by the state—there were documented cases of women who did not work without facing punishment. Economic necessity alone does not explain their choices either. Many letter authors emphasized the importance of work beyond its material benefits, while others mentioned that their husbands had actually asked them to quit their jobs.
So why did these women seek employment outside the home while still shouldering the majority of housework and childcare, especially when they were not in dire financial need?
The letters reveal that work had become fundamental to these women's identity. As one reader wrote: “Besides the financial side, I simply could not imagine at all how one could live without work; it meant a great deal to me.” They took pride in their uninterrupted work histories, often mentioning exact years of service, and viewed employment as both a civic duty and a source of personal fulfillment.
However, the research uncovered something even more significant: the crucial role of workplace relationships in Soviet women's lives. The women devoted far more space in their letters to describing relationships with colleagues than with their husbands or partners. Their workplace teams functioned almost like extended families, providing intellectual stimulation, emotional support, and social connection.
For one woman, the most devastating aspect of her difficult life was not her own illness or her child's frequent sickness, but her colleagues' disbelief that her child could be genuinely ill so often. Recognition and belonging within their work teams emerged as essential to these women's sense of self-worth.
This reveals a deeper truth about Soviet society: the workplace collective served as a vital social structure that sometimes rivaled the nuclear family in importance. In a rapidly modernizing society where people were often cut off from extended families and traditional rural communities, the work team provided crucial social bonds and intellectual engagement.
The fear of isolation loomed large. Being recognized as a valued team member was not just professionally satisfying—it was psychologically necessary. This explains why periods away from work, including maternity leave, often proved emotionally challenging for these women.
The struggles of Soviet working women resonated far beyond Soviet borders: in the 1970s-1980s, A Week Like Any Other was translated into twelve languages. While the specific circumstances were distinctly Soviet—from consumer shortages to mandatory political meetings—the fundamental struggle resonates with working mothers worldwide. The international success of Baranskaya's novella reflected similar transformations occurring globally as women entered the workforce en masse throughout the twentieth century.
The archived letters illuminate how Soviet women developed a unique form of subjectivity that balanced individual aspirations with collective belonging. They reveal women who were more individualistic than previous Soviet generations but who still found meaning and purpose through workplace communities.
The relationship between literature and life captured in these letters offers invaluable insights into a pivotal moment when traditional family structures collided with new economic and social realities: a collision whose effects continue to shape women's experiences today.
This research draws from master's thesis work examining previously understudied archival materials from the Russian State Archive of Literature and Art.
Primary Sources
- Rossjiskij Gosudarstvenyj Arhiv Literatury i Iskusstva [Russian State Archive of Literature and Art], f. 1702, op. 10, d. 63. Otzyvy chitatelej na povest' N.V. Baranskoj "Nedelya kak nedelya"
- Programme of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. Adopted by the 22nd Congress of the C.P.S.U. October 31, 1961, 61. https://archive.org/details/programmecpsu1961
Academic Publications
- Buckley, M. (1981). Women in the Soviet Union. Feminist Review, 8(1), 79–106. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.1981.13
- Engel, B. A. (2021). Marriage, household and home in modern Russia. Bloomsbury Publishing.
- Goldman, W. Z. (1993). Women, the state and revolution: Soviet family policy and social life, 1917-1936. Cambridge University Press.
- Hellbeck, J. (2001). Working, struggling, becoming: Stalin-era autobiographical texts. The Russian Review, 60(3), 340–359.
- Hellbeck, J. (2006). Revolution on my mind: Writing a diary under Stalin. Harvard University Press.
- Jarska, N. (2022). Managing the double identity: Married women as housewives and workers in post-1956 Poland. Journal of Women's History, 34(3), 82–102. https://doi.org/10.1353/jowh.2022.0026
- Kiblitskaya, M. (2000). Russia's female breadwinners: The changing subjective experience. In Gender, state and society in Soviet and post-Soviet Russia (pp. 55–70). Routledge.
- Kotkin, S. (1995). Magnetic Mountain: Stalinism as a civilization. University of California Press.
- Lapidus, G. W. (1978). Women in Soviet society: Equality, development, and social change. University of California Press.
- Lapidus, G. W. (Ed.). (1983). Women, work and family in the Soviet Union. Sharpe.
- Markevich, A. (2005). Soviet urban households and the road to universal employment, from the end of the 1930s to the end of the 1960s. Continuity and Change, 20(3), 443–473. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0268416005005709
- Pinsky, A. (2014). The diaristic form and subjectivity under Khrushchev. Slavic Review, 73(4), 805–827. https://doi.org/10.5612/slavicreview.73.4.805
- Pinsky, A. (2019). Subjectivity after Stalin: Guest editor's introduction. Russian Studies in History, 58(2–3), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/10611983.2019.1727714
- Yurchak, A. (2005). Everything was forever, until it was no more: The last Soviet generation. Princeton University Press.