Humans have a life history quite distinct from that of our close relatives: children depend on adults for nearly two decades, we live long past our reproductive years, and we produce far more energy over our lifetimes than our closest relatives do. What drove the evolution of these distinctive traits?
Our new research explores how the ability to share resources across generations affects how natural selection has shaped life history evolution. Using a mathematical model, we compare two evolutionary scenarios: one in which individuals must be energetically self-sufficient at every age, and one in which resources can flow between generations (parents feeding their children, grandparents supporting families).
The results show that when resource sharing is possible, selection favours:
Every living organism faces a fundamental dilemma: resources spent protecting genetic information from errors cannot be spent on growing, reproducing, or staying alive. This paper explores how this trade-off shapes an organism's life history.
Using mathematical modelling, we show that when organisms face higher rates of mutation accumulation (e.g. environmental factors, like radiation or toxins), they invest more in genetic repair. They also shift their entire life strategy toward "living faster": reproducing earlier, having more offspring, but living shorter lives.
Our key findings: