Recently, critique against the public health establishment has become a common feature in public debates on health risks, health promotion and disease prevention. This is manifested clearly in the case of vaccinations. The national vaccination programs have also been criticized, to the point where it is said that “herd immunity” has been jeopardized.
The media have become an important arena where struggles over the symbolic legitimacy of expert authority take place in late modern societies. Scientific experts have to increasingly compete over the public recognition of expertise as well as public authority and credibility. Further, new types of actors such as ‘field experts’, ‘lifestyle experts’, and experience-based experts claim credibility in public debates.
Hussein, Idil, Väliverronen, Esa, Nohynek, Hanna & Riikka Lämsä (2024) What makes an expert in childhood vaccinations? Vaccine 46.
Jallinoja, Piia, Vento, Eetu & Esa Väliverronen (2024) Trust in scientific institutions and experts during the first 2 years of the COVID-19 pandemic in Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health.
I. Hussein, S. Vänskä, J. Sivelä, T. Leino, H. Nohynek (2024) Factors associated with parental human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination intention of daughter: a national survey in Finland. Vaccine, 42 (3) (2024), pp. 701-712.
I. Hussein, S. Vänskä, J. Sivelä, T. Leino, H. Nohynek (2023) Factors associated with parental intention to vaccinate their child against influenza, Finland, February to march, 2022: a web-based survey
Eurosurveillance, 28 (49).
Väliverronen, Esa & Jallinoja, Piia (2021) Suomalaisten näkemykset asiantuntijoista ja rokotuksista. Havaintoja muutoksista ensimmäiseltä koronavuodelta. Yhteiskuntapolitiikka 86 (3): 323-333.
Väliverronen, Esa, Sivelä, Jonas & Hanna Nohynek (2020) Suomalaisten suhde rokotuksiin – mitä tuoreet kyselytutkimukset kertovat [The relationship of Finns to vaccinations – what recent surveys say]. Sosiaalilääketieteellinen aikakauslehti, 57 (3), 256–265. Open Access.