Bridget Anderson is the Director of
She is the author of
In this paper I’ll explore what we can learn at the intersection of labour, migration and precarity. I will start by considering two ways in which the temporal turn enriches the study of migration and mobility: Firstly, it encourages a processual approach to migration that moves away from fixity and ‘the migrant’ and towards ‘migrantisation’. Secondly, through drawing attention to temporality as a mechanism of governance it invites us to reflect on how the state governs through time. This is not peculiar to ‘migrants’, and the lens of temporal governance can help us unmake some of the constructed divisions between migrants and citizens. I will then explore some of the ways in which the labour precarity framing, which is very popular in labour migration research, can both further and undermine this project of unmaking differentiation. It can further it by capturing a particular kind of worker subjectivity and highlighting the relevance of social reproduction to lived experiences of contemporary work, and it can undermine it by introducing hierarchies of vulnerability and by distracting analysis away from taking migration as a class issue.
Vanessa May is Professor and Head of Sociology at the University of Manchester and a founding member of the Morgan Centre for Research into Everyday Lives. Her research interests include belonging, temporality, family life, and qualitative methods. Vanessa has published in a number of journals including Sociology, British Journal of Sociology, Sociological Review, and Time & Society. She is the author of Families (Polity) and Connecting Self to Society: Belonging in a Changing World (Palgrave Macmillan), and co-editor of Sociology of Personal Life (2nd edition, Red Globe).
My talk explores the intersections of belonging, time and migration-related precarity. Belonging – which can be defined as a fundamental sense of comfort and ease within oneself and one’s relational, social, cultural and material surroundings – is an inherently temporal experience. I revisit my work on the temporal nature of belonging, a core feature of which is a concern with people’s everyday lives and with relationality. In particular, I examine how the temporal horizons of past, present and future inform a person’s sense of belonging and how temporal belonging intersects with space and materiality. These insights are placed in conversation with recent work on the temporality of migration experiences, which foregrounds the structural foundations of temporal precarity. My aim is to consider how such a dialogue could enrich both the belonging literature and scholarship on migration.
Professor Cathrine Degnen's research focuses on how people create meaning and make sense of their social worlds in contexts of social transformation. She has built a significant body of work exploring this central interest in two key empirical areas: older age and everyday life, and the anthropology of Britain.
In
Generation or relative age is a common way humans define social difference. In Europe and North America, old age is frequently perceived as a period of decline and loss, a condition ‘successful ageing’ paradigms exhort individuals to avoid for as long as possible. Explicit and implicit ageist beliefs, discourses, and practices marginalize later life, portraying it as undesirable and inferior. This paper explores how imagined generational relationships with time – younger people as future facing, older people as ‘out’ of time – enrol linear, future-oriented temporal perspectives in reproducing ageism. The aftermath of the Brexit referendum followed closely by the covid-19 pandemic serve as my ethnographic examples. These two extraordinary events permit me to highlight how chronocracy (Kirtsoglou and Simpson 2020) – that is, the denial of coevalness or coexistence in time through everyday temporal regimes – reinforces unequal power dynamics, and to explore how generational groups are differently valued in contemporary England.