Publications metrics in recruitment

Quantitative indicators in researcher and research assessment support qualitative assessment by experts. At the University of Helsinki, the use of publication metrics in assessment and recruitment is guided by the University’s own guidelines and policies as well as the international recommendations to which the University is committed.
The University of Helsinki policy on the responsible assessment of research and researchers

The University of Helsinki policy on the responsible assessment of research and researchers describes the principles of assessment and the different assessment situations where they apply, including recruitment. The policy states that publication metrics can only be used to support qualitative assessment. It is important to familiarise yourself with the responsible use of selected indicators. The policy is based on national and international recommendations whose key message is that publication metrics indicators can be used to support qualitative assessment by experts, but qualitative assessment must be a priority.

 
University of Helsinki’s University-level recruitment principles

In terms of publication metrics, it is essential that only the information provided by applicants is used to assess them. If, in addition, a publication metrics analysis is desired, the applicant must be asked for their consent.

Link: Principles and practices of recruitment – Management, supervision and leadership – Flamma


How to select appropriate indicators to support assessment?

 


When publication metrics are used to support qualitative assessment, it is important to choose indicators appropriate for the appointment. The following questions help assess the responsibility and appropriateness of indicators:

  • Do the selected indicators provide information that is necessary for the assessment?
  • Does the indicator take into account differences between disciplines?
  • Whom may the selected indicators discriminate against?
  • What unwanted effects can the selected indicators have?
  • Is the indicator based on data relevant to the subject of the assessment?
  • Is the calculation method of the indicator transparent?
  • Has the indicator value been reported with appropriate precision?

Most indicators describe applicants’ publications from certain perspectives. The simultaneous use of multiple indicators is recommended in order to provide diverse information on publication output, compensating for individual indicator deficiency. Background information relevant to the interpretation of indicators must be available during assessment. 
Julkaisumetriikan tietokannat