After De Pinna, 1992 and Nelson, 1994, with species from Froese & Pauly, 2001 [“The Fishbase”]
<==o Stegophilinae [Pareiodontinae] [10[11]/30] |-- Acanthopoma annectens Lütken, 1892 |-- Apomatoceros alleni Eigenmann, 1922 |-- Haemomaster venezuelae Myers, 1927 |--o Henonemus Eigenmann & Ward, in Eigenmann, McAtee & Ward, 1907 [Gobitiglanis Fowler, 1914] | |-- H. intermedius (Eigenmann & Eigenmann, 1889) [Stegophilus intermedius Eigenmann & Eigenmann, 1889] | |-- H. macrops (Steindachner, 1882) | |-- H. punctatus (Boulenger, 1887) | |-- H. taxistigmus (Fowler, 1914) [Gobitiglanis taxistigmus Fowler, 1914] | `-- H. triacanthopomus DoNascimiento & Provenzano, 2006 |--o Homodiaetus | |-- H. anisitsi Eigenmann & Ward, 1907 | |-- H. passarellii (Miranda-Ribeiro, 1944) | `-- H. vazferreirai Devincenzi, 1939 |-- Megalocentor echthrus Pinna & Britski, 1991 |--o Ochmacanthus | |-- O. alternus Myers, 1927 | |-- O. batrachostoma (Miranda-Ribeiro, 1912) | |-- O. flabelliferus Eigenmann, 1912 | |-- O. orinoco Myers, 1927 | `-- O. reinhardtii (Steindachner, 1882) |--o Parastegophilus | |-- P. maculatus (Steindachner, 1879) | |-- P. nemurus | `-- P. paulensis (Miranda-Ribeiro, 1946) |-- Pareiodon microps Kner, 1855 |--o Pseudostegophilus | |-- P. haemomyzon (Myers, 1942) [Homodiaetus haemomyzon] | `-- P. nemurus (Günther, 1869) |?-o Schultzichthys | |-- S. bondi (Myers, 1942) [Acanthopoma bondi] | `-- S. gracilis Dahl, 1960 `--o Stegophilus |-- S. insidiosus Reinhardt, 1858 |-- S. panzeri (Ahl, 1931) `-- S. septentrionalis Myers, 1927
Reference(s):
- DoNascimiento, C. & Provenzano R., F., 2006: The genus Henonemus (Siluriformes: Trichomycteridae) with a description of a new species from Venezuela.
–Copeia: Vol. 2006 (106), #2, pp. 198-205 - Froese, R. & Pauly, D. (eds), 2001: FishBase.
–iNet: www.fishbase.org - Nelson, J. S., 1994: Fishes of the world.
–John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York, 1994, xx-600 - De Pinna, M. C. C. 1992: A new subfamily of Trichomycteridae (Teleostei: Siluriformes), lower loricaroid relationships and a discussion on the impact of additional taxa for phylogenetic analysis.
–Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society: vol. 106, #3, pp. 175-229