Vocabulary and history
Vocabulary related to the doctoral dissertation
respondentti ("Respondent") – the doctoral
candidate
opponentti ("Opponent") – the person debating
with the doctoral candidate at the public examination
kustos ("Custos") – Faculty-appointed chair of
the public examination
lectio praecursoria – introductory lecture by the doctoral
candidate
karonkka ("post-doctoral party") – an evening
party in honour of the Opponent
On the history of doctoral dissertations
Participation in public examinations of doctoral dissertations
was originally a formal part of studies. The objective was,
to quote the Finnish scholar Henrik Gabriel Porthan (1739-1804), "to
train the students in grasping matters quickly, stating their
arguments clearly, examining matters from a variety of perspectives
and distinguishing between issues of primary and secondary importance." The
professor wrote a dissertation manuscript, which was then defended
and debated by his students. For students at the outset of
their studies, these examinations were private, while the examinations
of more experienced students were public. Sometimes a professor
would discuss a given matter in several succeeding dissertation
manuscripts, but the candidate was required to be familiar
only
with the primary issues and contents of the dissertation in
hand so as to be able to defend it independently.
The degrees of Master of Philosophy and Doctor of Philosophy were
not separated until 1828 when new university statutes were issued.
Subsequently, students had to write their own dissertations to
obtain the doctoral degree. The candidates also had to give one
(in most cases) or more lectures. This tradition is reflected in
the introductory lecture (lectio praecursoria) currently given
at public examinations of doctoral dissertations.
|
