Publications

Jump to:

Research on supernatural, paranormal, superstitious and magical beliefs

Research on the psychology of food consumption, eating and health

Research on other social cognition, personality, clinical and social psychology topics

Research in higher education

Measures in databases

Doctoral dissertations since 2006

 

SUPERNATURAL, PARANORMAL, SUPERSTITIOUS AND MAGICAL BELIEFS

  1. Lindeman, M., Svedholm-Häkkinen, A. M., Lipsanen, J. (in press). Ontological confusions but not mentalizing abilities predict religious belief, paranormal belief, and belief in supernatural purpose. Cognition.
  2. Lindeman, M., Riekki, T., & Svedholm-Häkkinen, A. M. (in press). Individual Differences in Conceptions of Soul, Mind, and Brain. Journal of Individual Differences.
  3. Riekki, T., Lindeman, M., & Raij, T. (2014). Supernatural believers attribute more intentions to random movement than skeptics: An fMRI study. Social Neuroscience, 9, 400-411. DOI
  4. Lindeman, M. (2014). Spirituality studies are in need of differentia: A reply to Garssen and Visser. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 202, 178. DOI
  5. Lindeman, M., Heywood, B., Riekki, T., & Makkonen, T. (2014). Atheists become emotionally aroused when daring God to do terrible things. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 2, 124-132. DOI
  6. Lindeman, M., Svedholm, A. M., Riekki, T., Raij. T. & Hari, R. (2013). Is it Just a Brick Wall or a Sign from the Universe? An fMRI Study of Supernatural Believers and Skeptics. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8, 943-949. DOI
  7. Riekki, T. J. J., Lindeman, M., Lipsanen, J. (2013). Conceptions about the mind-body problem and their relations to afterlife beliefs, paranormal beliefs, religiosity, and ontological confusions. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 9, 112-120. Link
  8. Svedholm, A. M. & Lindeman, M. (2013). The separate roles of the reflective mind and involuntary inhibitory control in gatekeeping paranormal beliefs and the underlying intuitive confusions. British Journal of Psychology, 104, 303-319. DOI
  9. Riekki, T., Lindeman, M., Aleneff, M., Halme, A. & Nuortimo, A. (2013). Paranormal and religious believers are more prone to illusory face perception than skeptics and non-believers. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27,150-155. DOI
  10. Svedholm, A. M. & Lindeman, M. (2013). Healing, mental energy in the physics classroom: Energy conceptions and trust in complementary and alternative medicine in grade 10-12 students. Science & Education, 22, 677-694. DOI
  11. Lindeman, M. & Svedholm, A.M. (2012). What’s in a term? Paranormal, superstitious, magical and supernatural beliefs by any other name would mean the same. Review of General Psychology, 16, 241-255. DOI
  12. Lindeman, M., Blomqvist. S., & Takada, M. (2012). Distinguishing spirituality from other constructs: Not a matter of well-being but of belief in supernatural spirits. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 200, 167-173. DOI
  13. Lindeman, M., Riekki, T., & Hood, B.M. (2011). Is weaker inhibition associated with supernatural beliefs? Journal of Cognition and Culture, 11, 231-239. DOI
  14. Lindeman, M., Svedholm, A.M., Takada, M., Lönnqvist, J-E. & Verkasalo, M. (2011). Core knowledge confusions among university students. Science & Education, 20, 439-451. DOI
  15. Lindeman, M. (2011). Biases in Intuitive Reasoning and Belief in Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Psychology & Health, 26, 371-382. DOI
  16. Lindeman, M. (2011). Usko yliluonnolliseen johtuu intuitiivisesta ajattelusta (Supernatural beliefs stem from intuitive reasoning), Aviisi, 13, 28. Link
  17. Svedholm, A. M., Lindeman, M. & Lipsanen, J. (2010). Believing in the purpose of events – Why does it occur, and is it supernatural? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24, 252–265. DOI
  18. Lindeman, M. (2008). Intuitio ja usko yliluonnolliseen vaihtoehtolääkinnän suosion selittäjänä (Intuition, belief in supernatural, and the popularity of complementary and alternative medicine). Duodecim, 124(19), 2171 – 2177. Link   English summary
  19. Lindeman, M., Cederström, S., Simola, P., Simula, A., Ollikainen, S., & Riekki, T.  (2008). Sentences with core knowledge violations increase the size of N400 among paranormal believers. Cortex, 44, 1307-1315. DOI
  20. Lindeman & Aarnio (2007). Superstitious, magical, and paranormal beliefs: An integrative model. Journal of Research in Personality 41, 731-744 DOI
  21. Aarnio, K. & Lindeman, M. (2007).  Religious people and paranormal believers: Alike or different? Individual Differences, 28(1), 1-9. DOI
  22. Lindeman, M. & Saher, M. (2007). Vitalism, Purpose and Superstition. British Journal of Psychology, 98(1), 33-44. DOI
  23. Lindeman, M. & Aarnio, K. (2007) The Origin of Superstition, Magical Thinking, and Paranormal Beliefs. An Integrative Model. Skeptic, 13 (1), 58-65. Link   Also published in French (2009): L'origine des superstitions, un modèle récent en psychologie cognitive. Science et pseudo-sciences, 1, 284,10-15. Also published in German (2010): Der Ursprung von Aberglauben, magischem Denken und paranormalen Überzeugungen, Skeptiker, 2, 62-70.
  24. Lindeman, M. & Aarnio, K. (2006).  Paranormal beliefs: Their dimensionality and correlates. European Journal of Personality, 20: 585-602. DOI
  25. Aarnio, K. & Lindeman, M. (2005).  Paranormal beliefs, education, and thinking styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1227-1236. DOI
  26. Saher, M. & Lindeman, M. (2005). Alternative medicine: A psychological perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1169-1178. DOI
  27. Aarnio, K. & Lindeman, M. (2004). Magical Food and Health Beliefs: A Portrait of Believers and Functions of the Beliefs. Appetite, 43, 65-74. DOI
  28. Pyysiäinen, I., Lindeman, M. & Honkela, T. (2003). Counterintuitiveness as the hallmark of religiosity. Religion 33(4): 341-355. DOI
  29. Lindeman, M., Pyysiäinen, I. & Saariluoma, P. (2002). Representing God. Papers on Social Representations, 11, 1-13. Link
  30. Lindeman, M., Keskivaara, P. & Roschier, M. (2000). Assessment of magical beliefs about food and health. Journal of Health Psychology, 5, 195-209. DOI
  31. Tamminen. S. & Lindeman, M. (2000) Wartegg – luotettava persoonallisuustesti vai maagista ajattelua? (Wartegg – a valid personality test or magical thinking?) Psykologia, 4, 325-331.
  32. Lillqvist, O. & Lindeman, M. (1998). Belief in astrology as a strategy for self-verification and coping with negative life-events. European Psychologist, 3, 202-208. DOI
  33. Lindeman, M. (1998). Motivation, cognition and pseudoscience. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 39, 257-265. DOI

 

PSYCHOLOGY OF FOOD CONSUMPTION, EATING AND HEALTH:

  1. Leikas, S., Lindeman, M.,  Roininen,  K. & Lähteenmäki, L. (2009). Who is responsible for food  risks? The influence of risk type and risk characteristics. Appetite, 53, 123-126. DOI
  2. Lindeman, M. (2008). Vaihtoehtolääkinnän prototyyppiset piirteet (The prototypical features of complementary and alternative medicine). Duodecim, 124(22), 2593. Link
  3. Leikas, S., Lindeman, M., Roininen, K. & Lähteenmäki, L. (2007). Food risk perceptions, gender, and individual differences in avoidance and approach motivation, intuitive and analytic thinking styles, and anxiety. Appetite, 48(2), 232-248. DOI
  4. Saher, M., Lindeman, M. & Koivisto, U-K (2006). Attitudes towards genetically modified and organic foods. Appetite, 46(3), 324-331 DOI
  5. Saher, M. & Lindeman, M. (2005). Alternative medicine: A psychological perspective. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 1169-1178. DOI
  6. Lindeman, M., Keskivaara, P. & Roschier, M. (2000). Assessment of magical beliefs about food and health. Journal of Health Psychology, 5, 195-209. DOI
  7. Saher, M., Arvola, A., Lindeman, M. & Lähteenmäki, L. (2004). Impressions of functional food consumers. Appetite, 42, 79-89. DOI
  8. Aarnio, K. & Lindeman, M. (2004). Magical Food and Health Beliefs: A portrait of believers and functions of the beliefs. Appetite, 43, 65-74 DOI
  9. Lindeman, M. (2002). The state of mind of vegetarians: psychological well-being or distress? Ecology of Food and Nutrition, 41(1), 75-86. DOI
  10. Lindeman, M. & Stark, K. (2001) Emotional eating and eating disorder pathology. Eating Disorders, 9(3), 251-259. DOI
  11. Arvola, A., Saher, M., Lindeman, M. & Lähteenmäki, L. (2001). Kuluttajien mielikuvat terveysvaikutteisten elintarvikkeiden käyttäjistä. (Impressions of consumers purchasing functional foods). Espoo: VTT Biotekniikka.
  12. Lindeman, M., Stark, K. &  Keskivaara, P. (2001). Continuum and linearity hypotheses on the relationship between psychopathology and eating disorder symptomatology. Eating and Weight Disorders, 6 (4), 181-187. Link
  13. Lindeman, M. & Sirelius, M. (2001). Food choice ideologies: The modern manifestations of normative and humanist views of the world. Appetite, 37, 175-184. DOI
  14. Lindeman, M. & Väänänen, M. (2000). Measurement of ethical food choice motives. Appetite, 34, 55-59. DOI
  15. Lindeman, M., Stark, K. & Latvala, K. (2000). Vegetarianism and eating-disordered thinking. Eating Disorders, 8, 157-165. DOI
  16. Lindeman, M. & Stark, K. (2000). Loss of pleasure, identity food choice reasons and eating pathology. Appetite, 35, 263-268. DOI
  17. Lindeman. M. & Stark, K. (1999). Pleasure, pursuit of health, or negotiation of identity? Personality correlates of food choice motives among young and middle-aged women. Appetite, 33(1), 141-161. DOI
  18. Lindeman, M. (1995). Ruoka luo identiteettiä. Tiede 2000, 42-44. (Food choice: a modern way to construct identity. Science 2000, 8, 42-44)

 

OTHER SOCIAL COGNITION; PERSONALITY, CLINICAL, AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY:

  1. Raij, T.T., Riekki, T.J.J. & Hari, R. (in press). Association of poor insight in schizophrenia with structure and function of cortical midline structures and frontopolar cortex. Schizophrenia Research.
  2. Aspelund, A., Lindeman, M. & Verkasalo, M. (in press). Political conservatism and left–right orientation in 28 Eastern and Western European countries. Political Psychology.
  3. Raij, T. T. & Riekki, T. J. J. (2012). Poor supplementary motor area activation differentiates auditory verbal hallucination from imagining the hallucination. NeuroImage: Clinical, 1 , 75–80. DOI
  4. Lindeman, M. (2010). Intuition ja tieteellisen ajattelun vaativa liitto (The difficult union between intuition and scientific reasoning). Psykologia, 2, 179-182.
  5. Leikas, S., Lindeman, M., Roininen, K., & Lähteenmäki, L. (2009). Avoidance motivation, risk perception, and emotional processing. European Journal of Personality, 23, 125-147. DOI
  6. Leikas, S., Lindeman, M.,  Roininen,  K. & Lähteenmäki, L. (2009). Boundaries of regulatory fit: Is it the thought that counts? Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 31, 289-294. DOI
  7. Leikas, S. & Lindeman, M. (2009). Personality, threat identification and emotional processing. European Journal of Personality, 23, 455-474. DOI
  8. Leikas, S., Lönnqvist, J-E., Verkasalo, M., & Lindeman, M. (2009). Regulatory focus systems and personal values. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 415-429. DOI
  9. Lönnqvist, J-E., Walkowitz, G., Wichardt, P., Lindeman, M. & Verkasalo, M. (2009). The moderating effect of conformism values on the relations between other personal values, social norms, moral obligation, and single altruistic behaviors. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 525-546. DOI
  10. Leikas, S., Lönnqvist, J-E., Verkasalo, M., & Lindeman, M. (2009). Regulatory focus systems and personal values. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 415-429. DOI
  11. Lindeman, M., Hokkanen, L. & Punamäki, R-L. (2007). Hermoverkot, mielenterveys ja psykoterapia (Neural networks, mental health,and psychotherapy). Helsinki: Psykologien Kustannus.
  12. Lindeman, M. & Verkasalo, M. (2005). Measuring values with the short Schwartz's value Survey. Journal of Personality Assessment. Journal of Personality Assessment, 85, 170-178. DOI
  13. Hutri, M. & Lindeman, M. (2004). Spontaneous explanations for work events among individuals in an occupational crisis. Journal of Adult Development, 11, 273-280. DOI
  14. Björkholm, S. & Lindeman, M. (2004). Evoluutiopsykologia ja läsnäolo. Teoksessa J. Heinonen, G. v. Hertzen, & Kuusi, O. Nyt on ennen huomista. Saarijärvi: Gummerus. (Evolutionary psychology and presence. In J. Heinonen, G. v. Hertzen, & Kuusi, O. (Eds.) Before tomorrow, Saarijärvi: Gummerus.)
  15. Siren, A., Hakamies-Blomqvist, L., & Lindeman, M. (2004). Driving Cessation and Health in older women. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 23(1),58-69. DOI
  16. Hutri, M. & Lindeman, M. (2002). The role of stress and negative emotions in an occupational crisis. Journal of Career Development, 29(1), 19-36. DOI
  17. Lindeman, M. (1996). The effect of personal involvement and political experience on conceptions about political actors. International Journal of Psychology Research, 1, 47-52.
  18. Lindeman, M. & Behm, K. (1999). Cognitive strategies and self-esteem as predictors of brace-wear noncompliance in patients with idiopathic scoliosis and kyphosis. Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics, 19(4), 493-499. Link
  19. Lindeman, M. (1999). Height and our perception of others: An evolutionary perspective. In: U. Eiholzer, F. Haverkamp & L. Voss (Eds.) Growth, stature and psychosocial well-being (pp. 121-130). Bern: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.
  20. Sundvik, L. & Lindeman, M. (1998). Performance rating accuracy: Convergence between supervisor assessment and sales productivity. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 6, 9-15. DOI
  21. Sundvik, L. & Lindeman, M. (1998). Acquaintanceship and the discrepancy between supervisor and self-assessments. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13, 117-126. Link
  22. Lindeman, M. (1997). Elämysperäinen ja rationaalinen ajattelu. Teoksessa: R. Selin, M. Ollikainen & I. Salmi (Toim.). Paholaisen asianajajan paluu. Helsinki: Ursa. (Experiential and rational thinking. In R. Selin, M. Ollikainen & I. Salmi (Eds.), The return of the Devil’s advocate. Helsinki: Ursa)
  23. Lindeman, M. & Selin, R. (1997). Evoluutiopsykologia - kokonaiskuva ihmisestä? (Evolutionary psychology. An overall view of the human being?) Psykologia, 32, 4-12.
  24. Selin, R. & Lindeman, M. (1997). Kritiikin tylsä kärki (The blunt edge of critique). Psykologia, 32, 298-299.
  25. Lindeman, M., Harakka, T. & Keltikangas-Järvinen, L. (1997). Age and gender differences in adolescents' reactions to conflict situations: Aggression, prosociality and withdrawal. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26, 339-353. DOI
  26. Keltikangas, L. & Lindeman, M. (1997). Evaluation of theft, lying and fighting in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26, 467-483. DOI
  27. Lindeman, M. (1997). Ingroup bias, self-enhancement and group identification. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 337 - 355. DOI
  28. Verkasalo, M., Tuomivaara, P. & Lindeman, M. (1996). 15-year-old pupils' and their teachers' values and their beliefs about values of an ideal pupil. Educational Psychology, 16, 35-47. DOI
  29. Saari, S., Lindeman, M., Verkasalo, M. & Prytz, H. (1996). The Estonia disaster: A description of the crisis intervention in Finland. European Psychologist, 1(2), 135-139. DOI
  30. Lindeman, M., Saari, S., Verkasalo, M. & Prytz, H. (1996). Traumatic stress and its risk factors among peripheral victims of the M/S Estonia disaster. European Psychologist, 1(4), 255-270. DOI
  31. Lindeman, M. & Verkasalo, M. (1996). Meaning in life for Finnish students. Journal of Social Psychology, 136(5), 647-649. Link
  32. Lindeman, M. & Verkasalo, M. (1995). Personality, situation and positive-negative asymmetry in socially desirable responding. European Journal of Personality, 9, 125-134. DOI
  33. Lindeman, M., Sundvik, L. & Rouhiainen, P. (1995). Under- or overestimation of self? Person variables and self-assessment accuracy in work settings. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 10, 123-134.
  34. Lindeman, M. & Sundvik, L. (1995). Evaluative bias and self-enhancement among gender groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 269-280. DOI
  35. Lindeman, M. (1995). Henkilöhavainnoinnin harhat psykologin työssä. Teoksessa: K. Räikkönen & J-E Nurmi (Toim.), Personallisuus, terveys ja hyvinvointi. Acta Psychologica Fennica, 8. (Judgemental biases in psychological practice. In K. Räikkönen & J-E. Nurmi (Eds.), Personality, Health and Well-Being. Acta Psychologica Fennica, 8)
  36. Lindeman, M. & Verkasalo, M. (1995). Sosiaalisesti suotuisa vastaaminen: kontrolloitava virhetekijä vai osa hyvinvoivan ja rehellisen yksilön persoonallisuutta? Teoksessa: K.  Räikkönen & J-E Nurmi (Toim.), Personallisuus, terveys ja hyvinvointi. Acta Psychologica Fennica, 8. (Socially desirable responding: A factor to be controlled or a trait of a well-functioning and honest individual In K. Räikkönen & J-E Nurmi (Eds.), Personality, Health and Well-being. Acta Psychologica Fennica, 8)
  37. Lindeman, M. (Ed.) (1995). Toden näköiset harhat. Helsinki: Duodecim. (Lifelike illusions. Helsinki: Duodecim)
  38. Lindeman, M. (1995). Miksi uskomme sellaiseen, joka ei ole totta? Teoksessa: M. Lindeman (Toim.), Toden näköiset harhat. Helsinki: Duodecim. (Why do we believe in things that are not true. In M. Lindeman (Ed.), Lifelike illusions. Helsinki: Duodecim)
  39. Lindeman, M. (1995). Arkisen ajattelun ansat. Teoksessa: M. Lindeman (Toim.), Toden näköiset harhat. Helsinki: Duodecim. (The shortcomings of everyday thinking. In M. Lindeman (Ed.), Lifelike illusions. Helsinki: Duodecim)
  40. Verkasalo, M. & Lindeman, M. (1994). Personal ideals and socially desirable responding. European Journal of Personality, 8, 385-393. DOI
  41. Lindeman, M. & Mäkelä, A. (1994). Positiivisen ja negatiivisen informaation epäsuhta henkilöhavainnoissa (Positive-negative asymmetry in social perception).  Psykologia, 2, 122-125.
  42. Lindeman, M. & Koskela, P. (1994). Group size, controllability of group membership, and comparative dimension as determinants of intergroup discrimination. European Journal of  Social Psychology, 24, 267-278. DOI
  43. Sundvik, L. & Lindeman, M. (1993). Sex-role identity and discrimination of same-sex employees. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 66, 1-11. Link
  44. Lindeman, M. & Sundvik, L. (1993). Impact of height on assessments of Finnish female job applicants' managerial abilities. Journal of Social Psychology, 134, 169-174. Link
  45. Lindeman, M. (1993). Strength in positive and negative political attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 465-469. Link
  46. Lindeman, M. (1992). Poliittisten asenteiden voimakkuus ja äänestyskäyttäytyminen (The strength of political attitudes and voting behaviour). Sosiologia, 1, 35-44.
  47. Sorvali, H. & Lindeman, M. (1992). Harhautunut tiedonkäsittely - mielenterveyden edellytys (Biased information processing as a prerequisite for mental health). Psykologia, 27, 34-37.
  48. Lindeman, M. (1991). Sex differences in discriminating social information. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 229-236.
  49. Lindeman, M. (1989). Sosiaalinen älykkyys ja ihmisten arviointi (Social expertise and social evaluation).  Psykologia, 1, 4-8.
  50. Lindeman, M. (1989). Mihin suvaitsevaisuus hävisi? Sylttytehtailijan näkemys. (Where has tolerance disappeared?) Psykologia, 3, 224-226.
  51. Lindeman, M. (1989). Sosiaalisen tiedon jäsentyneisyyttä ja evaluaatiota sääelevät tekijät (Determinants of social evaluation and organization of knowledge. Psykologia, 6, 454-457.
  52. Lindeman, M. (1989). Social expertise and extremity in evaluation. Relationships between cognitive complexity, psychological and literary knowledge, group membership, values and evaluation. Research Reports, 9, Department of Psychology, Helsinki: University of Helsinki. (Doctoral dissertation)
  53. Lindeman, M. (1987). Kaikkihan me tiedämme. Tiede 2000, 3, 40-43. (Biases in social inference. Science 2000, 3, 40-43)
  54. Lindeman, M. (1985). Pedagoginen ihmiskuva. Yläasteenopettajien käsitysjärjestelmät sosiaalisen kognition näkökulmasta. Kouluhallituksen tutkimusselosteita, 49. (A social cognitive view of teachers' belief systems. National Board of Education, Research Reports, 49)

 

HIGHER EDUCATION:

  1. Lindeman, M. (1991). Tutor-opetus ja tietoon liittyvien taitojen oppiminen. Teoksessa K. Lonka ja I. Lonka (Toim.): Aktivoiva opetus. Käsikirja aikuisten ja nuorten opettajille. Tampere: Kirjayhtymä. (Acquiring knowledge-related skills. In K. Lonka & I. Lonka (Eds.), Activating Education. A Handbook for Teaching Adults. Helsinki: Kirjayhtymä)
  2. Lindeman, M. & Mikkonen, J. (1990). Miten opettaa ongelmakeskeistä ajattelua? (How to teach problem-centered thinking?) Kasvatus, 5-6, 381-383.
  3. Lindeman, M. (1986). Opetus ja opettajien pedagoginen ihmiskuva. Kouluhallituksen tiedotuslehti, 2. (Teachers' behaviour and educational schemata. National Board of Education Bulletin, 2)
  4. Lindeman, M. (1986). Alternative pedagogics: The tutorial method and processing of psychological information. The Finnish Higher Education Bulletin, 1, 20-22.
  5. Lindeman, M. (1986). Tutor-opetus syvensi opiskeluotetta psykologian alalla. Korkeakoulutieto, 1, 8-15. (The tutorial method deepened learning in psychology. Higher Education, 1, 8-15)

 

MEASURES IN DATABASES:

  1. Lindeman, M. (2012). Attitudes towards genetically modified and organic foods. PsycTESTS database. American Psychological Association.
  2. Lindeman, M. & Aarnio, K. (2012). Belief in the purpose of events. PsycTESTS database. American Psychological Association.
  3. Lindeman, M. & Aarnio, K. (2012). Core knowledge confusions. PsycTESTS database. American Psychological Association.
  4. Lindeman, M., & Väänänen, M. (2012). Ethical food choice motives. PsycTESTS database. American Psychological Association.
  5. Lindeman, M., & Stark, K. (2012). Ideological food choice motives. PsycTESTS database. American Psychological Association.
  6. Lindeman, M. (2012). Attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine (2012). PsycTESTS database. American Psychological Association.
  7. Lindeman, M. & Verkasalo, M. (2012). Short Schwartz's Value Survey.PsycTESTS database. American Psychological Association.
  8. Lindeman, M., Blomqvist, S., & Takada, M. (2012). Spirituality scale. PsycTESTS database. American Psychological Association.
  9. Lindeman, M. & Sirelius, M. (2006). Motives for Vegetarianism Scale. Health and Psychosocial Instruments. Behavioral Measurement Database Services.
  10. Lindeman, M., Sundvik, L. & Rouhiainen, P. (2004). Self-Esteem Measure. Health and Psychosocial Instruments. Database. Behavioral Measurement Database Services.
  11. Lindeman, M., Sundvik, L. & Rouhiainen, P. (2004).  Accuracy of Self-Assessments Measure. Health and Psychosocial Instruments. Behavioral Measurement Database Services.

 

DOCTORAL DISSERTATIONS SINCE 2006:

  1. Annika M. Svedholm (2013). The cognitive basis of paranormal, superstitious, magical and supernatural beliefs : The roles of core knowledge, intuitive and reflective thinking, and cognitive inhibition. Link
  2. Sointu Leikas (2010). On the moderators of trait avoidance motivation in predicting cognitive biases and adjustment. Link
  3. Kia Aarnio (2007). Paranormal, superstitious, magical, and religious beliefs. Link
  4. Marieke Saher (2006). Everyday beliefs about food and health. Link

Last update 24 September 2014