The red leaves swish about my feet; the autumn
day is turning into dusk. The bombing raids in Afghanistan
and the war against terrorism grab the tabloid headlines. I bump into
an old acquaintance I used to meet at the university cafeteria, someone
from the era of youth and idealism, the '60s. We both look slightly baffled.
"Weren't we supposed to make the world a better place?" I
enquire.
"It was a better place, for a little while," he says. With
a wave of our hands, we part.
Matti Virtanen discusses the same thing when he suggests in
his thesis, The Heirs of Fennomania, the Finnish Nationalist Movement:
Political Traditions and the Dynamics of a Generation, that the
membership a certain age group is not enough as such to create a specific
bond between the members of a generation. A feeling of unity can emerge
only after we share an experience and live through it; a specific experience
unites the generation. In his thesis, Virtanen deals with historical
turns, starting from the Fennomanian movement of the 1820s and 1880s,
and for example, the 1918 Civil War, the Second World War 1939-1945,
the youth movements in the 1960s and 1970s, up to the present day activist
movements.
According to Virtanen, the social and intellectual movements were triggered
by the mobilisation and the experiences shared by the '60s and '70s
generations. The young of those days today middle-aged
are now in a position to decide about war and peace. No wonder the current
news evoke confused feelings, the disappearance of idealism and a feeling
of betrayal.
"From the perspective of cultural advancement, forgetting is as
elementary as remembering," Virtanen writes. Who remembers the
ideals of non-violence of our youth? "It's not enough that we know
something. We should also try to understand why," said Estonian
author Jaan Kaplinski on October 24th in a meeting
at Villa Kivi, The Other World? The Islamic World and Culture,
arranged by Helsinki Authors' Association. Kaplinski's calm European
approach, his intellectual manner of expression, so emblematic of Estonians,
the Tartu scent of his coat once again brought to my mind a sequence
of events, which once gave me then a student living the hectic
days of youth the historical role as a go-between for two cultural
personalities of the early 1900s. Only recently has it dawned on me
how bitterly disappointed they must have felt in the divided, Cold War
Europe which had, on the eve of the Second World War, separated them
for the rest of their lives.
When the Helsinki-Tallinn ferry route was opened in the mid 1960s,
a Finnish delegation from the Eino Leino Association went to visit Estonian
national author Friedebert Tuglas. The meeting was featured in
the newspapers and attracted due attention. The old city centre of Tallinn
cautiously opened up to the post-war generations, showing its wonders.
We young people had also heard that Irene Tiittanen, an eccentric
elderly female journalist with her bobbed hair and 1920s-style strap-shoes,
known as Firinä, had worked as a secretary to the author
Hella Wuolijoki, had been a friend of Olavi Paavolainen,
the leading figure of a modernist artists' group Tulenkantajat, and
had frequented the cultural meetings of the prominent literary group
Kiila.
The rumours had it that her Ingrian husband had disappeared during
the war. This was something that Firinä never talked about. She
was often seen in the editorial office of Suomen Kuvalehti even
after she retired; a wrinkled, witty woman with an ever-burning cigarette
in its long holder.
I was a summer trainee in the editorial office. When Firinä found
out that I, enthusiastic about the new ferry route, visited Tallinn
every now and then, she gave me a letter addressed to Friedebert and
Elo Tuglas, to be personally delivered to the author's villa
in Nõmme. Because of the KGB censorship, Firinä was reluctant
to use the regular mail.
White-haired Tuglas, who spoke beautiful Finnish, was delighted to
receive messages from Firinä; I always had a letter from him to
bring back with me to Finland. The close relationship between the Estonian
and Finnish cultural intelligentsia in the 1920s and 1930s, the new
age of independence, happy memories from the pre-Second World War era
and as early as the very beginning of the 20th century for me,
the letters made the bygone world alive. My generation was quite ignorant
about Estonia, save something like the 'Saarenmaa Waltz' by Georg
Ots which was frequently played on the radio when we were children.
I once asked Firinä why she did not visit Tuglas herself; the
ferry trip only took a couple of hours. Her reaction was stern: "Why
should I set my foot on the soil of an occupied country," she said,
stiffening up. I did not understand this fully until in the 1990s, when
the Baltic history opened up after the collapse of the Soviet Union.
The last time I took Firinä's letter, and smuggled a pair of golden
sandals through the customs in order to give them to Elo Tuglas, I found
the beautiful villa in Nõmme deserted. The doors and windows
were open, the air was full of flower scent and the butterflies flew
in the garden. It seemed that the place had been left in great haste.
Months later, Firinä came to me, devastated, to tell that she
had received a letter from Friedebert. In his last letter, Tuglas had
written that his wife Elo had been taken to the hospital on the very
same day of my visit and been buried wearing those golden sandals. Shortly
afterwards, in the early 1970s, both Friedebert Tuglas and Firinä
also died.
A story of the friendship of three people; their mutual experience,
the feeling of being a member of a generation, which endured wars, the
division of Europe, the era of Stalinism and the Cold War, has emerged
in my mind lately, giving a feeling of miraculous hope.
Theirs was a dream of an independent country, language, and culture.
Ours was a better, more equal and international world. Now I wait for
the key experience of the World Trade Center generation: what will be
their dream?
Maarit Niiniluoto is an author and journalist. ß