|
|
||
Justification:“African poverty and stagnation is the greatest tragedy of our time. Poverty on such a scale demands a forceful response.” That is how the Commission for Africa, established and chaired by British Prime Minister Tony Blair, starts its recent report. UN web pages on the UN Millennium Goals (MDGs) conclude that “Sub-Saharan Africa is the epicenter of crisis, with continuing food insecurity, a rise of extreme poverty…” and rapid degradation of environment. The United Nations Millennium Declaration in 2000 recognised the special needs of Africa and achievement will be measured for the first time this year. While I am writing this in July 2005, leaders of the world’s richest countries have just agreed to boost aid and cancel debts. There is a worldwide focus on the development crisis in Africa but so far aid and numerous development strategies have failed to yield the expected results.One of the UN Millennium Project task forces focuses specifically on how science, technology and innovation can help in achieving the MDGs. Linking scientific knowledge to development and creation of new strategies at all levels - from global to local level - to improve livelihoods in Africa are acutely needed. This requires better understanding of development alternatives. This study is an in-depth, community level analysis of the livelihoods and environment of two East African highland communities, with a central theme built around the crucial question for the whole continent: How can livelihoods in Africa be improved while sustaining the environment?
|
||
Introduction:The main objective is to study interactions of livelihoods and environmental change concentrating on both social and ecological implications of land use change in the context of population pressure, socio-economic and regional historical factors. The study attempts to answer the central question: What are the crucial assets or combinations of assets (human, social, natural, physical and financial capital) that enable rural dwellers to have improved strategies leading to better livelihood outcomes?This comparative study will draw general lessons from the similarities and differences between three ecologically similar study sites. It will focus on the connections between ethnicity, global climate change, world market prices, and national policies (including those on land ownership, crops and marketing and support to farm inputs) and the development of the highlands of East Africa. It will provide better understanding of the stages of development and the complex socio-economic, political and environmental changes associated with it. This is needed by development professionals to better identify entry points of interventions which could play an important role in improving livelihoods and natural resource management of these highlands, or reversing an adverse trend. Examples of such interventions will be derived.
| ||
Overall goalImproved understanding of the socio-economic and ecological implications of development pathways in the highlands of East Africa. This leads to improved recommendations and planning of development interventions aiming at better and more sustainable livelihoods and natural resource management.
|
||
OutputsPhD thesis consisting of the following:
|
||
Main study sitesMt. Kilimanjaro in Tanzania and Taita hills in Kenya (Embu as a complementary site, utilising studies of other researchers).
|
||
Methods1. Land use change analysis of Kirua Vunjo on Mt Kilimanjaro area using aerial photographs from 1961, 1982 and 2000 and a Landsat +ETM image of year 2000 to study landscape level changes, including landscape fragmentation, over the past 40 years, and comparing the two different classification methods used. 2. Livelihood surveys on both Mt. Kilimajaro and in the Taita hills
The survey was designed according to Sustainable livelihoods framework (Carswell, 1997; Carney, 1998; DFID, 2001 ) the aim being to test the model by using empirical data. 3. Comparative study of bird diversity in three important land use categories (Lowland fields, Bushland and Highlands) on the slopes and adjacent plains of Mt. Kilimanjaro to understand potential biodiversity impacts of the land use changes taking place. 4. Synthesis of the above: Interactions of land use and change, biodiversity and livelihoods in the highlands of East Africa in the context of existing scientific knowledge on other world regions.
|
||
Work accomplished so farost of the work, including all fieldwork and most of the analysis, has been done in a researcher post at the World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Nairobi. The project was originally initiated by ICRAF in autumn 1999. Following the recommendations of my then ICRAF supervisor Dr. Robert Zomer, I enrolled as a PhD student at the University of Helsinki in 2000, and this ICRAF project became my personal project leading to PhD. |
||
|
||
|